**Please Note: **
This article is written for users of the following Microsoft Excel versions: 2007, 2010, and 2013. If you are using an earlier version (Excel 2003 or earlier), *this tip may not work for you*. For a version of this tip written specifically for earlier versions of Excel, click here: Strange ATAN Results.

Jerry notes that when he uses the ATAN function in Excel to calculate an arctangent, he gets a result that's quite a bit different from the result provided when he uses a scientific calculator to derive the arctangent. This makes him wonder if there is something strange in how the ATAN function works.

There are two possibilities here. The most likely possibility is that your calculator defaults to using degrees in trigonometric functions such as calculating an arctangent. Excel uses radians exclusively. For example, let's say you wanted to calculate the arctangent for 0.5. If you plug this into your calculator, and your calculator is working in degrees, you'll get a rounded result of 26.565. However, using the ATAN function in Excel produces a rounded result of 0.464.

The result that Excel provides is in radians, and when you convert that result to degrees, you end up with 26.565—the same as your calculator's result. Here's how you can easily do the conversion:

=DEGREES(ATAN(0.5))

If the angle for which you want to find the arctangent is expressed in degrees instead of radians, then you'll need to do the conversion on the input:

=ATAN(RADIANS(30))

Again, remember that the result of the ATAN function is always in radians, so you may also want to do a conversion on the output, as well.

The solution is to make sure that your calculator is working in radians mode, which should give you the same results as Excel. Either that or you need to convert Excel's results (and, possibly, input) to degrees, as shown above.

The other possibility is much less likely, but it is worth mentioning: There are some values for which the ATAN function will break down, but for which your calculator may already compensate. The best explanation of the scenarios under which this could happen is provided in this Wikipedia article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atan2

*ExcelTips* is your source for cost-effective Microsoft Excel training.
This tip (11437) applies to Microsoft Excel 2007, 2010, and 2013. You can find a version of this tip for the older menu interface of Excel here: **Strange ATAN Results**.

**Comprehensive VBA Guide** Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) is the language used for writing macros in all Office programs. This complete guide shows both professionals and novices how to master VBA in order to customize the entire Office suite for their needs. Check out *Mastering VBA for Office 2010* today!

The VLOOKUP function, like other lookup functions in Excel, is not case sensitive. In other words, it doesn't matter ...

Discover MoreWhen you need to count a number of cells based upon a single criteria, the standard function to use is COUNTIF. This tip ...

Discover MoreThe SUMIFS function can be quite powerful in conditionally summing information based on criteria you specify. This tip ...

Discover More**FREE SERVICE:** Get tips like this every week in *ExcelTips,* a free productivity newsletter. Enter your address and click "Subscribe."

2016-08-11 17:41:41

Don

Don

2016-08-10 06:01:13

Rod Grealish

I have found a formula at http://www.mrexcel.com/forum/excel-questions/559852-rgb-hue-formula.html

=IF(180/PI()*ATAN2(2*B2-C2-D2,SQRT(3)*(C2-D2))<0,180/PI()*ATAN2(2*B2-C2-D2,SQRT(3)*(C2-D2))+360,180/PI()*ATAN2(2*B2-C2-D2,SQRT(3)*(C2-D2)))

(The semi-colons in the original need to be replaced by commas). The formula gives a divide by zero (#DIV/0!) error when all the rgb values are equal.

Your formala appears to be part of the above formula where 1.732.. is SQRT(3) and 57.295... is 180/PI().

Rod

2016-08-07 19:08:26

Don

Thanks for the reply. I tried reordering the cells; but, still haven't resolved this problem. Not being a math wiz; I'm somewhat stumped.

I grabbed the formula from a website:

ATAN2(1.732050808*(C2-D2),(2* B2-C2-D2))*57.295779513

B2 = Red = 251

C2 = Green = 252

D2 = Blue = 247

Result in column E2 = 19.10660534643070

I used ColorMania (v5.1) Color Picker to check my work. It says that Hue should equal 72 degrees.

2016-08-06 13:12:14

Rod Grealish

This seems to be a problem in colour theory. Cells B1, C1 and D1 seem to contain rgb values. If 19 and 72 are approximate values for the angles I assume the 'exact' values add up to 90. This would suggest that a sign is incorrect in the formula, or possibly the rgb values are in an incorrect order. What are the expected and actual hue angles when other rgb values are used?

Rod

2016-08-05 19:14:13

Don

Ops! I forgot to tell you what Cells B1,C1, and D1 equate to:

B1 = 251

C1 = 252

and

D1 = 247

2016-08-05 19:10:07

Don

I'm using this formula:

=ATAN2(1.732050808*(C1-D1),(2* B1-C1-D1))*57.295779513

and getting:

19.1066053464307000

The HUE Angle should be approx. 72 degrees NOT 19 degrees

What am I doing wrong?

Got a version of Excel that uses the
ribbon interface (Excel 2007 or later)?
**This site is for you!** If you
use an earlier version of Excel, visit
our *ExcelTips* site focusing on the menu interface.

**FREE SERVICE:** Get tips like this every week in *ExcelTips,* a free productivity newsletter. Enter your address and click "Subscribe."

Copyright © 2019 Sharon Parq Associates, Inc.

## Comments