For some data tables in Excel, you may want to assign a record number to cells in a particular column. For instance, you might want record numbers for 20 different records, ranging between 1 and 20 or between 100 and 119. It doesn't really matter to Excel what range you select. How you go about setting up the record numbers depends on what you want to later do with them.
If you want the record numbers to be static—that is, they are always assigned to a particular record and never change—then you should use the AutoFill feature of Excel to assign the numbers. To do this, simply enter all your data except the record numbers. Then type in the first two or three record numbers, select them, and drag on the AutoFill handle (the black square at the bottom-right corner of the selection) to fill out the rest of the records.
Using this approach is fast and easy, but it does make the record numbers static. For instance, if you delete the record that has a record number of 107, then that particular record number is gone, and your numbers will show a gap, jumping from 106 to 108.
If you want dynamic record numbers—ones that change as you make deletions—then you can use a formula to calculate the record numbers. You could put the first record number in, for instance, cell A5, and then in the next cell down you would use a formula such as =A5+1 to calculate the new record number.
This still presents a problem, however, because if you delete a record, all the record numbers below the one you deleted will show an error (#REF!). Why? Because you delete a cell on which the next cell down was dependent. A better solution is to use a record number formula that is dependent on the row in which the formula is located. For instance, let's assume your first record is in row 5. You could use this formula to generate a range of record numbers starting with 100:
=ROW()+95
Now, if you delete a record, the remaining record numbers readjust themselves and you don't end up with any errors.
If you use this approach, you'll want to make sure that you don't delete any rows above those rows that contain your records, as doing so will cause your record numbers to be incorrect. For instance, if you use the above formula and you delete row 3, your first row for records becomes row 4, so your first record number becomes 99. (Remember that you wanted them to start with 100, so this is now incorrect!)
To head off this potential error, change your first formula (in cell A5) to the following:
=ROWS($A$4:$A5)+98
Note that this formula doesn't use the ROW function, but the ROWS function. The ROWS function returns the number of rows in the range specified. In this case, it returns the value 2, which is added to 98, giving the desired record number of 100. Plus, if you delete any rows before row 4, your formula still works. You can copy the formula from A5 down as far as necessary, and you should end up with the proper record numbers in all the cells.
ExcelTips is your source for cost-effective Microsoft Excel training. This tip (12402) applies to Microsoft Excel 2007, 2010, 2013, and 2016. You can find a version of this tip for the older menu interface of Excel here: Working with Record Numbers.
Comprehensive VBA Guide Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) is the language used for writing macros in all Office programs. This complete guide shows both professionals and novices how to master VBA in order to customize the entire Office suite for their needs. Check out Mastering VBA for Office 2010 today!
The number of formats used in a workbook can become a problem if you run up against the limit Microsoft hard-coded into ...
Discover MoreDoes your worksheet or workbook not always recalculate like you expect? If so, then some of the ideas in this tip may ...
Discover MoreWhen you freeze panes in a worksheet, those panes should persist even though you save the workbook and reload it. There ...
Discover MoreFREE SERVICE: Get tips like this every week in ExcelTips, a free productivity newsletter. Enter your address and click "Subscribe."
2021-05-28 05:48:00
John Mann
Clarifying Bernard's comment.
You have to double-click the fill handle, not the selected range. It appears to only work if there is range of data in an adjacent column, which doesn't need to be formated as a table.
Double-clicking the fill handle doesn't appear to work for filling along a row.
Tests done in Excel 2010
2017-07-13 10:20:19
Allen Windhorn
Henk -- Thanks for the correction -- should have cut and pasted.
2017-07-12 08:09:03
Bernard
you don't need to drag the autofill handle, a doubleclick fills the entire range
2017-07-11 04:10:59
Henk
@Allen Windhorn: There is a mistake in your formula.
I tried the following (based on your reasoning) and it worked:
=MAX(INDIRECT("$A$5" & ":" &"A" & ROW()-1))+1
2017-07-10 10:04:06
Allen Windhorn
Another way is e.g. =MAX(INDIRECT($A$5:$A" & TEXT(ROW()-1,"0")))
With this you can insert blank or comment rows (non-numeric first column), or rearrange the order of rows, and the numbering will stay sequential. A5 should contain zero (or one less than first number)and should not be moved.
2017-07-09 14:26:02
The ROW or ROWS might work but another easy solution is to use OFFSET as in =OFFSET(A2,-1,0)+1 where A2 is the current cell. This adds 1 to whatever cell is currently above the active cell.
Got a version of Excel that uses the ribbon interface (Excel 2007 or later)? This site is for you! If you use an earlier version of Excel, visit our ExcelTips site focusing on the menu interface.
FREE SERVICE: Get tips like this every week in ExcelTips, a free productivity newsletter. Enter your address and click "Subscribe."
Copyright © 2022 Sharon Parq Associates, Inc.
Comments